5 Simple Techniques For constructive trusts case law
5 Simple Techniques For constructive trusts case law
Blog Article
“There isn't any ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any on the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din saw firstly the deceased and after far they noticed the petitioners going towards the same direction, did not signify that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. This sort of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of last viewed.
The main focus is over the intention to cause injury. This is usually a major dilemma: an incredibly lower threshold for an offence carrying the death penalty.
These platforms empower individuals to understand their legal rights and obligations, marketing a more informed and just society.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Supplied the legal analysis on the subject issue, we are with the view that the claim of your petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Preliminary contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is not legally audio, In addition to promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They can be subject matter to rules and regulations In case the recruitment rules of the subject post permit the case with the petitioners for promotion could possibly be deemed, however, we're crystal clear inside our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded as for seniority and promotion because the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health, matter to availability of vacancy topic for the approval in the competent authority.
Now it is perfectly-settled that considerations for pre-arrest and post-arrest bail are absolutely different, therefore, in our view the figured out Judge had fallen in error to cancel the bail allowed to petitioner from the same Additional Sessions Judge.”
This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside a manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the summary or finding reached from the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. Should the summary or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may perhaps interfere with the conclusion or perhaps the finding and mold the relief to make it proper towards the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is definitely the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified through the decision from the Supreme Court inside the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
Following the decision, NESPAK, as directed, conducted an assessment on the grid project and submitted that ample mitigation measures were in place to render any likely adverse impacts negligible. Based on this, the grid station was permitted to become created.
In any society, the enforcement of law and order is essential to maintain peace and protect its citizens. Among the most significant crimes that can disrupt this harmony is murder. In Pakistan, Section 302 on the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) deals with the punishment for murder, and its enforcement is critical to make sure justice prevails.
department concerned shall offer the complete list of ACRs from the concerned officer to DPC well in advance cases for promotin(Promotion)
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-223999 Tag:Offered the legal analysis on the topic issue, we are with the view that the claim of the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Original contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle will not be legally seem, Aside from promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They're subject matter to rules and regulations When the recruitment rules of the topic post permit the case in the petitioners for promotion could be regarded as, however, we have been distinct within our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded as for seniority and promotion as being the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health and fitness, subject matter to availability of vacancy topic on the approval from the competent authority.
کیا ایف آئی آر read more درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
The case of *R v. Ahmed* exemplifies the practical application of this amendment and its potential to secure economic interests and maintain the integrity in the national currency. As legal practitioners and citizens, a comprehensive grasp of those changes is important for upholding the principles of justice and contributing to a strong legal system.
This landmark case expanded the fundamental rights to life and dignity by interpreting these rights to encompass the right to the healthy environment. This decision is particularly significant as there aren't any specific provisions during the Pakistani Constitution regarding environmental protection. In relation to environmental law in Pakistan, it is actually important that the case recognized the application of the precautionary principle where there is really a menace to environmental rights, and emphasised the positive obligations of the State in protecting the right to a clean and healthy environment.
Within the United States, individuals are not needed to hire an attorney to represent them in either civil or criminal matters. Laypeople navigating the legal system on their have can remember a single rule of thumb when it relates to referring to case law or precedent in court documents: be as specific as you can, leading the court, not only to the case, but on the section and paragraph containing the pertinent information.